HomeSearchContact UsSite AnalysisDecision Process
Why StonewearWhy GFRCStoneForm™ServiceMaterial TechnologyCollision PhysicsTest Results
Threat AssessmentSite ChecklistsDOS SpecificationCSI SpecificationsAccessories
Watering PlantsModels:
|
Barrier Collision Physics
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison of Barrier Types Tested by US Army Corps of Engineers® |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Retaining Wall Type | |||
| Straight | Slopped Back | Planter Design | |
| Tested Stopping Strength | 15,000 lb @ 30 mph |
15,000 lb @ 40 mph |
15,000 lb @ 50 mph |
| Depth in Earth | 49½" | 30" | 18" |
| Wall Thickness | 21" | 18" - 54" | 12" - 18" Dirt - 6" |
| Rebar Size at Impact Area | #7 @ 5" | #7 @ 6" | #5 @ 8" |
| Apparent Force Protection Stopping Strength as Speed Increase in 10 mph Increments | X | 2X | 3X |
Why would a structure less securely attached to the earth, with thinner walls, and smaller reinforcing steel bars be 1000 times stronger in resisting and stopping the impact of a 15,000 lb vehicle?
A moving vehicle can be thought of as having kinetic energy (energy of motion). The faster it is going the more kinetic energy it has. Actually the kinetic energy of a moving vehicle is proportional to the square of the velocity, so a car going 50 mph has four times the kinetic energy of the same car going 25 mph.
The way a crash barrier works is to take the kinetic energy out of the moving vehicle. It can do this in several ways:
Under explosive conditions or crash conditions an energy-absorbing barrier is always better than a rigid barrier. This has been proven by many tests. Rigid barriers will fail under relative small impact velocities while energy absorbing barriers will be able to survive much higher velocities.
A soil filled planter is an excellent energy absorber. When a vehicle hits the planter the vehicle turns into an earth plow and loses its energy rapidly as it burrows through the barrier. The kinetic energy of the vehicle transforms into heating of the soil, due to friction, and into kinetic energy of the soil itself as it plumes up and out.
Another way of looking at this is to note how a barrier absorbs energy. The energy absorbed is roughly the reaction force multiplied by the distance that the barrier travels as it stops the vehicle, so the more distance the barrier travels through, the lower the force.
A rigid retaining wall, by its very nature, doesn't travel very far when it stops a vehicle. Maybe an inch or so at the most. So the force on the barrier is very large. A planter type barrier, on the other hand, stops the vehicle through a stroke of several feet. So the stopping forces are relatively low. This explains why a planter type barrier can have a much shallower foundation than a rigid barrier.
s/ David Lee
|
Copyright © 1997-2008 by STONEWEAR | 2900 Lockheed Way, Carson City, NV 89706 | 775-883-8300 |